The sector overview
Technology is the only sector where three-quarters of companies earn A-grades. Out of 36 analyzed companies, 29 grade A. The median FCF margin sits at 26.9%. The sector average debt-to-FCF ratio is 2.1x, meaning most companies could pay off their debt in two years of cash flow.
27 companies show improving trends. 5 are stable. 4 are declining.
This isn't a sector struggling to generate cash. This is a sector where the winners dominate and the losers are obvious.
The top tier
Palantir leads with a 46.9% FCF margin. NVDA follows at 44.8%. Broadcom sits at 42.1%. Adobe at 41.4%. Veeva at 39.7%.
All five grade A. Four of the five show improving trends. Adobe is the only stable name, and stable at 41.4% isn't a problem.
What separates these companies isn't just margin level. It's consistency. Palantir's margin has climbed quarter over quarter. NVDA's cash generation accelerated alongside AI infrastructure demand. Broadcom prints cash across semiconductors and enterprise software. Adobe's subscription model converts revenue to cash with minimal friction. Veeva owns a vertical (life sciences software) and extracts premium margins because of it.
These aren't growth stories waiting to become profitable. These are cash machines that happen to be growing.
The middle 20
Between Veeva's 39.7% and Apple's 23.7%, you get 20 more A-grades. This includes Microsoft at 25.4%, Salesforce at 32.8%, ServiceNow at 34.1%, and most of the cybersecurity and cloud infrastructure names.
The interesting pattern: improving trends dominate this group too. Datadog, CrowdStrike, Zscaler, Okta, Workday, Snowflake. All A-grades. All improving.
The software-as-a-service model works when you look at free cash flow instead of GAAP earnings. Recurring revenue converts to cash. Sales and marketing spend amortizes over customer lifetime value. Once a SaaS company reaches scale, the margins expand.
Apple's 23.7% margin grades A because the threshold for technology is 25%, and Apple gets an upgrade modifier for its net cash position and consistency. The company generates $100B in annual free cash flow. The margin percentage doesn't tell the full story when the absolute dollar amount is that large.
The semiconductor split
Semiconductor names span the entire grade range. NVDA and Broadcom at the top. Analog Devices at 38.8%. Qualcomm at 28.9%. Applied Materials at 20.1%. AMD at 19.4%. Texas Instruments at 14.7%.
Then you hit Micron at 4.5% and Intel at -9.4%. Both grade F.
The split reflects capital intensity and competitive position. NVDA and Broadcom design chips with high margins and outsource manufacturing. Applied Materials sells the equipment other companies use to manufacture chips, so they avoid the capex burden of running fabs. AMD designs but doesn't manufacture.
Micron and Intel own and operate their own fabrication facilities. That means billions in capex every quarter. Micron's 4.5% margin reflects memory chip commoditization and the capital required to stay competitive. Intel's negative margin reflects both manufacturing struggles and market share losses.
Intel is improving, according to the trend data. The question is whether improvement from -9.4% matters when competitors operate at 40%+ margins.
The failures
Three F-grades: Intel, Oracle, Micron.
Intel burns cash. Oracle's -0.7% margin comes from massive capex spend on cloud infrastructure while revenue growth stalls. The company is trying to compete with AWS and Azure by building out data centers. The cash flow says it isn't working. Oracle's trend is declining, which makes it the only name in the sector getting worse while burning cash.
Micron's trend is improving, but improving from 4.5% in a sector where the median is 26.9% isn't a win. The company operates in a commodity market with pricing power dictated by supply-demand cycles. When memory prices spike, Micron prints cash. When prices fall, margins collapse. The business model doesn't support a durable A-grade.
What one C-grade means
Cloudflare grades C with a 10.0% margin and an improving trend. The company sits below the 12% threshold for a B-grade in technology.
Cloudflare is scaling. Revenue is growing. The trend is improving. But free cash flow hasn't caught up to the growth narrative yet. The company invests heavily in network infrastructure and sales. That depresses short-term cash generation.
The improving trend matters here. If Cloudflare crosses 12%, it jumps to a B. If it reaches 18%, it's an A. The question is whether the infrastructure spend pays off before competition compresses margins.
Two B-grades tell a story
Cisco and Texas Instruments both grade B. Cisco sits at 23.5% with a declining trend. TI sits at 14.7% with an improving trend.
Cisco's margin would grade A (above the 25% threshold), but modifiers pulled it down. The declining trend is the problem. Cisco's legacy networking business faces pressure from cloud-native infrastructure. The company generates cash, but the trajectory is wrong.
Texas Instruments operates below the 18% threshold for an A-grade. The improving trend keeps it at B instead of dropping to C. TI manufactures analog chips, which carry lower margins than digital semiconductors but face less competition. The business is stable but not spectacular.
The sector health verdict
76% A-grades. A 26.9% median margin. 75% of companies showing improving or stable trends. Average debt-to-FCF at 2.1x.
This is the healthiest sector in the market by free cash flow standards.
The concentration at the top matters. Palantir, NVDA, Broadcom, Adobe, Veeva, Analog, Zoom, Palo Alto, ServiceNow, Salesforce. These ten companies all exceed 32% FCF margins. They don't just beat the sector threshold. They double it.
The failures are obvious and avoidable. Intel burns cash. Oracle burns cash while revenue stagnates. Micron operates in a structurally low-margin business. You don't need complex analysis to spot these.
The middle tier is where it gets interesting. Names like Cloudflare, Shopify, and AMD sit between 17% and 20% margins with improving trends. These are the companies where the next 12 months matter. If trends continue, they solidify A-grades. If growth spending overwhelms cash generation, they slip.
But the sector overall? Strong. The median company generates 26.9% free cash flow margins. The average company is improving. The debt levels are manageable. The top performers print cash at rates most sectors can't touch.
Technology doesn't need a turnaround story. It needs investors to stop ignoring free cash flow in favor of revenue multiples.
Get our best analysis
Free cash flow insights and stock grades, delivered to your inbox.
Aureus Research
Data-driven analysis grounded in free cash flow fundamentals. Every grade, every insight, backed by real numbers from public financial statements.
More Research
Technology's Cash Machine: 37 A-Grades and a Median Margin That Should Terrify Every Other Sector
The technology sector is printing cash at a 24.2% median margin — more than double most industries — with 80% of companies earning A-grades. But the gap between winners and losers has never been wider.
Microsoft's A-Grade Is Built on Real Cash
MSFT converts 25% of revenue into free cash flow. The A-grade isn't generous. It's arithmetic.
Apple's A-Grade Hides a Liquidity Problem Most Analysts Aren't Talking About
Apple generates $98.8 billion in free cash flow with a 23.7% margin — exceptional by any measure. But the current ratio of 0.89 tells a different story about what happens when the bills come due.